Skip to main content

Not safer, just stupider.

The first definition of stupider is "Slow to learn or understand; obtuse." I think that there would be good cause to add to it "See American".

Today, while passing through the security checkpoint at Portland International (PDX) I witnessed the TSA personnel sending people to the back of the line for not taking off their flip-flops. They shouted endlessly about removing liquids, regardless of size. And they generally treat every one of us like we were infants incapable of understanding simple instructions.

But perhaps they might be on to something.



You see, we suffer through these hurdles each and every time we fly. Ridiculous attempts to make the general populace feel safer. However, reality speaks in a different voice.

While the TSA is rapaciously taking liquids out of our luggage - they are missing real weapons, like 4 inch locking blade knives. But hey, you might say - it was a one time occurrence... Or you might think that silly fellow was making it all up. Well then how would you explain other news reports? When security testers are able to sneak BOMBS through the TSA checkpoints, how then are we any safer without breast-milk or perfume? Perhaps every American should watch this documentary on TSA training. It is a real eye opener.

So why are we sheeple allowing this to happen? Why - to save us from the big bad boogeyman, err - I mean terrorist.

But really, what is the risk? More people die each day from medical mal-practice than die in terrorism attacks in the entire year. Heck, more people die from falling down stairs than do in terrorist attacks. OK, so lets just look at one BIG terrorist attack.

September 11, 2001. The attacks on the United States in New York and Washington D.C. I am sure you have heard of them. On that terrible day there were 2999 people were killed or have gone missing as a direct result of those attacks. Terrible, without doubt. And on that day airport security changed forever.

In fact, sitting here in August 2007 there is still a message played repeatedly over the PA system at PDX: "Due to increased security measures, only passengers with tickets or boarding passes will be allowed beyond security checkpoints". Hmm, I am wondering - how long are those "increased" security measures. I would think that after more than 5 years of the "increased" security measures that they would become "standard" security measures. But what has the "increase" in security measures and subsequent "increase" in traveling difficulty and hassle bought us?

Every year in the United States nearly 40,000 people are killed by cars. That is FORTY THOUSAND people in auto related fatalities EACH YEAR. Or, in other terms, more than 10 times as many people than were killed on September 11, 2001 due to terrorist activities. And each year, about 6000 of those were NON-MOTORIST, meaning pedestrians and cyclists and the like. So every year cars and their drivers kill twice as many innocent people as the terrorists on September 11.

Each and every year.

Yet where are our increased security measures for drivers? Why don't we do frequent testing of drivers? Why is driving still considered a "right" and not a "privilege"? Why do we have to turn over our water bottles at Airport Security yet drivers with suspended licenses keep on driving and killing people?

So perhaps people in America are infants who are incapable of following instructions, because the evidence clearly shows that Americans are incapable of grasping the facts about where the REAL risks in their lives are coming from. But it is much more convenient to sit at home watching the idiot box and the media talking about big bad evil terrorists - than it is to rearrange and re-plan our lifestyles to make us less dependent on cars, or to make car ownership and driving a difficult privilege to get and keep.

Some day America will have to wake up and see that cars can and do kill.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Straying from the original point, no? I'll agree with airport security, you lost me on cars, and keep in mind the perspective I have on the matter.
Yokota Fritz said…
It's rather simple: we put up with increased security theater in airports in response to terror threats, while with driving we make it easier than ever to kill with the motor vehicle. Cars are so full of safety features that most wrecks result in relatively few injuries as long as you're inside the car. Safety features encourage bonehead driving.
ValkRaider said…
Kenny - the point is the same, we spend all kinds of time and effort and money on something that makes us no safer while we let people die by the thousands in cars...

Simple...

:)

Popular posts from this blog

Why shooting should be banned on public lands:

I don't need to say too much. The pictures speak for themselves. These pictures were taken at ONE spot on NF-45 forest road in Mt. Hood National Forest. The road is also known as "Memaloose" or "Maymaloose" road depending on which sign and map you read. It is maybe 50 miles outside of Portland, southeast on Hwy 224 - along the Clackamas river. The country up there is some of the most beautiful scenery on the planet. The ridge lines, and the deep jagged canyon from millions of years of raging water in the Clackamas river are something wonderful to behold. Driving up this road, we passed at least 5 spots that seemed to be popular with shooters, before we turned around. The road is a steep one lane paved road, and our GPS said we went from 700ft. at the river to 3000ft. almost instantaneously. At some points there are steep 1000 foot drops on either side of the road. It is breathtaking. Until you come across the shooting sites, which make you nauseous. I ...

Stop renaming Portland streets.

Not only have they chosen one of the best Blogger themes, but the folks at cafe unknown have also put together a wonderful piece laying out much more eloquently than I would - why we should not be renaming Portland's streets , and how there are better more appropriate options. Please Please stop renaming Portland's streets. Portland has history too. And changing the names of the streets to honor those who were not really even part of Portland's history does a disservice to all of those who have made Portland their home in the last 150 some odd years. If you want to name new streets - fine. But keep the old ones. Please.

Every bit of plastic ever made still exists.

If you have ever crate trained a pet dog, you will have found that dogs will do everything within their power to not shit where they sleep. A dog will hold it until their face turns blue. Unless of course they are already blue, then they will just get a darker shade. And if you (and the dog) have had the misfortune of getting stuck a little to long, and the dog HAS had to go in their crate, the minute the poor canine makes eye contact with you - you know it. The dog will feel as though they have betrayed the universe by pooping in the crate. Well, humans are assholes. We could learn a thing or two from our dogs. We only have one earth. Only one. No "fall back" or "plan B" exists despite what you may see in the Star Trek movies or read in the Cristopher Stasheff or Orson Scott Card novels. I imagine that some day some poor wasted species - a distant relative to the Human - who has had to survive underground or in bubbles without being able to breathe ...